Part B sẽ ôn lại 6 dạng bài tập quan trọng môn Financial Management (F9) với chủ đề Investment Appraisal.
1. Tổng quan:
Topic |
Question types |
Question index |
|
MCQ |
Cases |
||
Investment appraisal |
NPV |
1-5 |
|
Capital rationing |
6 |
||
Lease or buy |
7 |
8 |
|
Asset replacement |
9 |
||
Risk & Uncertainty |
10-12 |
||
Basic techniques |
13, 14 |
||
Reference: BPP ACCA F9 - Financial Management StudyText Knowledge Base: [FM/F9: Tóm tắt kiến thức] Lesson 7: Các phương pháp thẩm định đầu tư cơ bản (Basic investment appraisal techniques) |
2. Dạng bài tập chi tiết
Mức độ: Quan trọng
2.1. Dạng 1: Net present value
Trắc nghiệm
Câu 1: (intermediate)
Question: Which TWO of the following statements are correct?
A. |
Tax allowable depreciation is a relevant cash flow when evaluating borrowing to buy compared to leasing as a financing choice |
B. |
Asset replacement decisions require relevant cash flows to be discounted by the |
C. |
If capital is rationed, divisible investment projects can be ranked by the profitability |
D. |
Government restrictions on bank lending are associated with hard capital rationing |
Answer: C, D
Tax saving on the tax allowable depreciation (TAD) is relevant cash flow, not depreciation itself => A is false.
The cost of capital is used for asset replacement decisions. The after-tax cost of debt would be used in a lease vs buy => B is false.
Profitability index (PI) is used to rank divisible projects. => C is true.
Government restrictions on bank lending would represent hard capital rationing. => D is true
Câu 2: Intermediate
Jones Ltd plans to spend $95,000 on an item of capital equipment on 1 January 20X2. The expenditure is eligible for 25% tax-allowable depreciation, and Jones pays corporation tax at 30%. Tax is paid at the end of the accounting period concerned. The equipment will be sold for $25,000 on 31 December 20X5. Jones has a 31 December year end and has a 10% post-tax cost of capital.
What is the present value (PV) at 1/1/20X2 of the tax savings from the TAD?
A. $16,991 | B. $15,828 |
C. $16,018 |
D. $19,827 |
Guidance:
Note: 2 areas often cause problems with tax: tax timing & tax savings CF.
Pay attention to tax timing to find the exact discount factor (DF).
If T0 is now, assumed at 1/1/20X2, then T1 is in 1 years’ time which is 31/12/20X2 or 1/2/20X2. (T1 is both the end of Year 1 and the start of Year 2).
“Tax is paid at the end of the accounting period concerned” => pay in 1 years’ time.
It is the tax savings on the depreciation, is the relevant cash flow considered to find the PV.
The answer, effectively used for OT or case questions, could be presented as below:
Tax period |
Narrative |
($) |
Tax saved at 30% ($) |
Timing (T) |
DF |
PV ($) |
Initial investment TAD |
x (x) |
|||||
x |
||||||
Initial investment TAD |
(x) |
|||||
Balancing allowance |
Answer: A. $16,991
Tax period |
Narrative |
Tax saved at 30% ($) |
Timing |
DF at 10% |
PV ($) |
|
31/12/X2 |
Initial investment TAD |
95,000 (23,750) |
7,125 |
0 1 |
0.909 |
6,477 |
31/12/X3 |
TAD |
71,250 (17,813) |
5,344 |
2 |
0.826 |
4,414 |
31/12/X4 |
TAD |
53,438 (13,359) |
4,008 |
3 |
0.751 |
3,010 |
31/12/X5 |
Disposal Balancing allowance |
40,078 (25,000) 15,078 |
4,523 |
4 |
0.683 |
3,090 |
16,991 |
Câu 3: Basic
Data of relevance to the evaluation of a particular project are given below.
Cost of capital in real terms |
10% per annum |
Expected inflation |
8% per annum |
Expected increase in the project’s annual cash inflow |
6% per annum |
Expected increase in the project’s annual cash outflow |
4% per annum |
Which of the following sets of adjustments will lead to the correct NPV being calculated?
Guidance: Different rates of inflation => use 'money approach', i.e. the cash flows must be inflated at their specific rates and discounted at the money cost of capital.
Answer: B
(1 + Money rate) = (1 + Real rate) × (1 + Inflation rate) = 1.1 × 1.08 = 1.188
Câu 4: A project has an initial outflow at time 0 when an asset is bought, then a series of revenue inflows at the end of each year, and then finally sales proceeds from the sale of the asset. Its NPV is £12,000 when general inflation is zero % per year.
If general inflation were to rise to 7% per year, and all revenue inflows were subject to this rate of inflation but the initial expenditure and resale value of the asset were not subject to inflation, what would happen to the NPV?
A. |
The NPV would remain the same |
B. |
NPV would rise |
C. |
NPV would fall |
D. |
NPV could rise or fall |
Answer: C
The NPV impact of the initial outflow is unaffected.
The revenue flows will be subject to inflation, but then should be discounted at a money rate which includes this inflation => The net effect is no change in the PV.
The sales proceeds represent a flow of money, not affected by inflation, but this will now
be discounted at a higher money rate, lowering NPV of the project.
Câu 5:
Spotty Ltd plans to purchase a machine costing $20,000 to save labour costs. Labour savings would be $8,000 in the first year and labour rates in the second year will increase
by 10%. The estimated average annual rate of inflation is 8% and the company’s real cost of
capital is estimated at 12%. The machine has a two-year life with an estimated actual
salvage value of £5,000 receivable at the end of year 2. All cash flows occur at the year end.
What is the NPV (to the nearest $) of the proposed investment?
Guidance: Calculate the
(I) money cost of capital
(II) present in cash flow table to get the NPV.
How to get money cost of capital?
i: nominal interest rate |
|
Use Fisher formula: (1+i) = (1+r)*(1+h) |
r: real interest rate |
h: inflation rate |
|
The real rate (r) and the general inflation rate (h) must be expressed as decimals when using the Fisher formula. |
Important: |
Pay attention to the correct timing of each cash flow |
Discount factor = 1(1+r)n (r: cost of capital; n: period) |
Answer: $ (3,954)
(I) Money cost of capital = [(1.08 × 1.12) – 1] × 100 = 20.96%
(II) Answer presenting:
Timing |
T0 |
T1 |
T2 |
Initial investment ($) |
(20,000) |
||
Labour ($) |
8,000 |
8,800 |
|
Salvage ($) |
5,000 |
||
DF at 20.96% |
1 |
0.8627 |
0.6835 |
(20,000) |
6,613.6 |
9,432.3 |
|
NPV = (3,954.1) |
2.2. Dạng 2: Capital Rationing
Trắc nghiệm
Câu 6: Four projects, I, II, III, and IV, are available to a company which is facing shortages of capital over the next year but expects capital to be freely available thereafter.
I |
II |
III |
IV |
|
$’000 |
$’000 |
$’000 |
$’000 |
|
Total capital required over lifetime of the project |
20 |
30 |
40 |
50 |
Capital required for next year |
20 |
10 |
30 |
40 |
NPV of the project at company cost of capital |
60 |
40 |
80 |
80 |
In what sequence should the projects be selected if the company wishes to maximise net present values?
Guidance: “facing shortages of capital over the next year but expects capital to be freely available thereafter” => Capital rationing in single period with divisible projects => Profitability Index application.
PI = NPV/Investment => Investment priority base on ranking in order of highest to lowest PI.
Answer: Investment sequence: II, I, III, IV.
I |
II |
III |
IV |
|
PI (NPV/Investment) |
=60/20 =3 |
=40/10 =4 |
=80/30 = 2.67 |
=80/40 =2 |
Ranking |
2 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
3.3. Dạng 3: Lease or buy
Trắc nghiệm
Câu 7: B Co is considering whether to buy or lease two following assets:
Asset 1: 10-year economic life, 0 residual value. It can be bought by paying $80,000 immediately or leasing with 10 lease rentals of $12,000 per year payable annual in advance.
Asset 2: 5-year economic life. It can be bought by paying $81,000 immediately and it will have $40,000 residual value after 5 years. Or, it can be leased with 5 lease rentals of $14,000 per year payable in arrears.
How should B Co finance these assets?
Asset 1 |
Buy |
= -80,000 |
Lease |
= (AF1-9 at 10%+1)*-12,000 |
|
= (5.759 + 1) * -12,000 = -81,108 => Buy |
||
Asset 2 |
Buy |
= -81,000 + (40,000/1.15) |
= -56,163 |
||
Lease |
= (AF1-5 at 10%) * -14,000 |
|
= 3.791 * -14,000 = -53,074 => Lease |
Tự luận
Câu 8:
ASOP Co is considering an investment in new technology that will reduce operating costs through increasing energy efficiency and decreasing pollution. The new technology will cost $1 million and have a four-year life, at the end of which it will have a scrap value of $100,000.
A licence fee of $104,000 is payable at the end of the first year. This licence fee will increase by 4% per year in each subsequent year.
The new technology is expected to reduce operating costs by $5.80 per unit in current price terms. This reduction in operating costs is before taking account of expected inflation of 5% per year.
Year |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Production |
60,000 |
75,000 |
95,000 |
80,000 |
If ASOP Co bought the new technology, it would finance the purchase through a four-year loan paying interest at an annual before-tax rate of 8.6% per year. Alternatively, ASOP Co could lease the new technology. The company would pay four annual lease rentals of $380,000 per year, payable in advance at the start of each year. The annual lease rentals include the cost of the license fee.
If ASOP Co buys the new technology it can claim tax allowable depreciation on the investment on a 25% reducing balance basis. The company pays taxation one year in arrears at an annual rate of 30%. ASOP Co has an after-tax weighted average cost of capital of 11% per year.
Required: Based on financing cash flows only, calculate and determine whether ASOP Co should lease or buy the new technology.
Answer:
- After-tax cost of borrowing = 8.6 × (1 – 0.3) = 6% per year
Evaluation of leasing
Year |
CF |
Amount ($) |
DF at 6% |
PV ($) |
0-3 |
Lease rentals |
(380,000) |
(1+2.673) = 3.673 |
(1,395,740) |
2-5 |
Tax savings |
114,000 |
3.465 * 0.943 = 3.267 |
372,438 |
(1,023,302) |
PV of cost of leasing = $1,023,302
Evaluation of borrowing to buy
(W1) Tax benefit
Year |
TA depreciation |
Tax benefits $ |
License fee tax benefits $ |
Total $ |
2 |
1,000,000 * 0.25 = 250,000 |
75,000 |
31,200 |
106,200 |
3 |
750,000 * 0.25 = 187,500 |
56,250 |
32,448 |
88,698 |
4 |
562,500 * 0.25 =140,625 |
42,188 |
33,746 |
75,934 |
5 |
421,875 – 100,000 = 321,875 |
96,563 |
35,096 |
131,659 |
Year |
Capital |
License fee $ |
Tax benefits $ |
Net CF |
DF at 6% |
PV $ |
0 |
(1,000,000) |
(1,000,000) |
1 |
(1,000,000) |
||
1 |
(104,000) |
(104,000) |
0.943 |
(98,072) |
||
2 |
(108,160) |
106,200 |
(1,960) |
0.89 |
(1,744) |
|
3 |
(112,486) |
88,698 |
(23,788) |
0.84 |
(19,982) |
|
4 |
100,000 |
(116,986) |
75,934 |
58,948 |
0.792 |
46,687 |
5 |
131,659 |
131,659 |
0.747 |
98,349 |
||
(974,762) |
PV of borrowing to buy = $974,762.
ASOP Co should buy the new technology since the present cost of borrowing to buy is lower than the present cost of leasing.
2.4. Dạng 4: Asset replacement
Trắc nghiệm
Câu 9: Basic
A company buys a machine for $10,000 and sells it for $2,000 at time 3. Running costs of the machine are: time 1 = $3,000; time 2 = $5,000; time 3 = $7,000.
If a series of machines are bought, run, and sold on an infinite cycle of replacements, what
is the equivalent annual cost of the machine if the discount rate is 10%?
Guidance: EAC = NPV/AF
Answer:
Timing |
$’000 |
DF |
$’000) |
0 |
(10) |
1 |
(10) |
1 |
(3) |
0.909 |
(2.727) |
2 |
(5) |
0.826 |
(4.13) |
3 |
(7) |
0.751 |
(5.257) |
NPV = (22, 144) => EAC = 22,144/2.487 = $8,904
2.5. Dạng 5: Risk and Uncertainty
Trắc nghiệm
Câu 10: Intermediate
Arnold is contemplating purchasing for $400,000 a machine to produce 55,000 units of a product per annum for five years. These products will be sold for $15 each and unit variable costs are expected to be $10. Incremental fixed costs will be $80,000 per annum for production costs and $35,000 per annum for selling and administration costs. Arnold has a required return of 10% per annum.
By AT LEAST how many units must the estimate of production and sales volume fall for the project to be regarded as not worthwhile?
Guidance:
Note: Consider from investor’s perspective => Required return is cost of capital => Cash flows needs to be discounted at 10% to present value.
Not worthwhile project means NPV = 0 or worse => Changes from WHICH aspect lead to NPV falling?
Answer: 15,630 units
Timing |
Cash flow $’000 |
10% factor |
PV $ |
|
0 |
Initial investment |
(400) |
1 |
(400,000) |
1-5 |
Fixed costs |
(115) |
3.791 |
(435,965) |
1-5 |
Contribution |
= (15-10)*55 000 |
3.791 |
1,042,525 |
NPV |
206,560 |
The initial NPV is positive and the investment is worthwhile.
In order for this project to be not worthwhile, its contribution must fall by $340,350 or by 206560/1,042,525 = 19.8%.
Therefore, the sale volume goes in the same manner and must fall by = 19.8% * 55,000 = 10,897 units.
Câu 11: (Basic)
An investment project has a cost of $12,000, payable at the start of the first year of
operation. The possible future cash flows arising from the investment project have the
following present values and associated probabilities:
PV of |
Probability |
PV of |
Probability |
16,000 |
0.15 |
20,000 |
0.75 |
12,000 |
0.60 |
(2,000) |
0.25 |
(4000) |
0.25 |
What is the expected value (EV) of the net present value of the investment project?
$
Guidance: EV = Cash flow value * related probability
Answer: $11,100
EV of PV of year 1 cash flow: $16,000 × 0.15 + $12,000 × 0.6 – $4,000 × 0.25 = $8,600
EV of PV of year 2 cash flow: $20,000 × 0.75 – $2,000 × 0.25 = $14,500
Total PV = ($12,000) + $8,600 + $14,500 = $11,100.
Câu 12: Advanced
A shop has the following probability distribution of weekly demand for a product.
Demand |
Probability |
300 |
0.4 |
400 |
0.3 |
600 |
0.3 |
Orders must be made each week in advance, any inventory left is scrapped. Cost per item is $2.5 and each item is sold for $3.
What is the optimum quantity to be ordered each week?
Guidance:
Optimum quantity ordered => gives the highest expected value of returns.
With returns = Revenue – Cost.
Step 1: Draw up a profit/loss matrix:
Probability |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
EV ($) |
Demand |
300 |
400 |
600 |
|
Order quantity |
||||
300 |
(W1) |
(W2) |
(W2) |
|
400 |
||||
600 |
Step 2 (Working – W): Calculate returns (profit/loss) for all scenarios.
For example:
Order |
Cost per unit ($) |
Cost |
Demand |
Selling price |
Revenue |
Revenue – Cost ($) |
300 |
2.5 |
750 |
300 |
3 |
900 |
150 |
400 |
2.5 |
1000 |
600 (*) |
3 |
1200 (*) |
200 |
Note: Demand > Order => Out of stock because no buffer inventory remained, any item left is scrapped. => Highest return when all ordered quantities are sold.
Step 3: Calculate the total EV for each option of order quantity.
Total EV = Total of (Profit/loss of each ordering scenario * probability in demand)
Step 4: Compare and choose highest EV => Optimum order amount obtained.
Answer:
Step 1: Draw up profit/loss matrix
Probability |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
EV ($) |
Demand |
300 |
400 |
600 |
|
Order quantity |
||||
300 |
(W1) |
(W2) |
(W2) |
|
400 |
||||
600 |
Step 2: Calculate returns (profit/loss) ($) for all scenarios.
Probability |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
EV ($) |
Demand |
300 |
400 |
600 |
|
Order quantity |
||||
300 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
|
400 |
(100) |
200 |
200 |
|
600 |
(600) |
(300) |
300 |
Step 3: Calculate the total EV of returns for each option of order quantity.
Probability |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
EV ($) |
Demand |
300 |
400 |
600 |
|
Order quantity |
||||
300 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
400 |
(100) |
200 |
200 |
80 |
600 |
(600) |
(300) |
300 |
-240 |
Step 4: Choose the highest EV
Order quantity of 300 units gives highest EV returns of $150
=> Optimum order quantity = 300 units.
Tự luận
Câu 12: Advanced
Vyxyn Co is evaluating a planned investment in a new product costing $20m, payable at the start of the first year of operation. The product will be produced for four years, at the end of which production will cease. The investment project will have a terminal value of zero. Financial information relating to the investment project is as follows:
Year |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Sales volumes (units/year) |
440,000 |
550,000 |
720,000 |
400,000 |
Selling price ($/unit) |
26.5 |
28.5 |
30 |
26 |
Fixed cost ($/year) |
1,100,000 |
1,121,000 |
1,155,000 |
1,200,000 |
These selling prices have not yet been adjusted for selling price inflation, which is expected to be 3·5% per year. The annual fixed costs are given above in nominal terms. Variable cost per unit depends on whether competition is maintained between suppliers of key components. The purchasing department has made the following forecast:
Competition |
Strong |
Moderable |
Weak |
Probability |
45% |
35% |
20% |
Variable cost ($/unit) |
10.8 |
12 |
14.7 |
The variable costs in this forecast are before taking account of variable cost inflation of 4·0% per year. Vyxyn Co can claim tax-allowable depreciation on a 25% per year reducing balance basis on the full investment cost of $20m and pays corporation tax of 28% per year one year in arrears.
It is planned to finance the investment project with an issue of 8% loan notes, redeemable in ten years’ time. Vyxyn Co has a nominal after-tax weighted average cost of capital of 10%, a real after-tax weighted average cost of capital of 7% and a cost of equity of 11%.
Required:
(a) Calculate the expected net present value of the investment project and comment on its financial acceptability.
Guidance:
(a)
Step 1: Inflation - Working 1 (W1):
Note: Question involving tax & inflation and different inflation rate => Fisher formula must be used to find the nominal rate.
Step 2: Calculate inflated sales (W2)
Year |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Sales volumes (units/year) |
||||
Inflated selling price ($/unit) |
||||
Inflated sales |
Step 3: Calculate inflated variable costs (W3)
Note: In case of risk and uncertainty, mean value is calculated before taking into account of inflation.
Step 4: Tax benefits (W4)
Note: Pay attention to tax timing and present the working as following:
Year |
Narrative |
Value ($) |
Tax benefit at ? (%) ($) |
Timing (T) |
Initial investment TAD |
x (x) |
|||
x |
||||
Initial investment TAD |
(x) |
|||
Balancing allowance |
Step 5: Working capital needs (W5)
In question of WC needs => cash outflow pay attention to its correct timing.
Step 6: Present the answer using the following pro-forma:
Year |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
$’000 (if needed) |
|||||
Sales income |
|||||
Variable costs |
|||||
Contribution |
|||||
Fixed costs |
|||||
Taxble cash flow |
|||||
Taxation at tax rate |
|||||
Tax benefits (W2) |
|||||
WC needs (W3) |
|||||
After-tax CF |
|||||
DF at nominal rate |
|||||
PV |
Total PV or future CF |
|
Initial investment |
|
ENPV |
Answer:
(b)
Step 1: Nominal cost of captail is given = 10%
Step 2: Calculate Inflated sales – W1
Year |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Sales volumes (units/year) |
440,000 |
550,000 |
720,000 |
400,000 |
Selling price ($/unit) (*) |
=26.5 * 1.035 = 27.4 |
= 28.5*1.035 = 29.5 |
= 30*1.035 = 31.1 |
= 26*1.035 = 26.9 |
Inflated sales ($’000) |
12,056 |
16,225 |
22,392 |
10,760 |
(*) rounded number to 1 decimal.
Step 3: Variable costs (VC) – W3
Mean variable cost = 10.8 * 0.45 + 12*0.35 + 14.7*0.2 = $12 per unit
Year |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Variable cost ($/unit) |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
Infalted 4% per year |
=12*1.04 = 12.48 |
=12*1.042 12.98 |
=12*1.043 = 13.5 |
=12*1.044 =14.04 |
Sales volume (units/year) |
440,000 |
550,000 |
720,000 |
400,000 |
Total variable costs |
= 440,000*12.48 = 5,491,000 |
= 550,000*12.98 = 7,139,000 |
= 720,000 *13.5 = 9,720,000 |
= 400,000*14.04 = 5,616,000 |
Step 4: Tax benefit – W4
Tax timing: Payable in arrears
Year |
Narrative |
Value ($’000) |
Tax benefit at 28% ($) |
Timing of benefit (T) |
1 |
Initial investment TAD at 25% |
20,000 (5,000) |
1,400 |
2 |
15,000 |
||||
2 |
TAD at 25% |
(3,750) |
1,050 |
3 |
11,250 |
||||
3 |
TAD at 25% |
(2,812.5) |
787.5 |
4 |
8437.5 |
||||
4 |
(8,437.5) |
2362.5 |
5 |
|
Balancing figure |
0 |
Step 5: Working capitl needs (no needs - ignored in this question) (W5)
Step 6: Present the answer:
Year |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
$’000 |
$’000 |
$’000 |
$’000 |
$’000 |
|
Sales income (W2) |
12,069 |
16,791 |
23,947 |
11,936 |
|
Variable costs (W3) |
(5,491) |
(7,139) |
(9,720) |
(5,616) |
|
Contribution |
6,578 |
9,652 |
14,227 |
6,320 |
|
Fixed costs |
(1,100) |
(1,121) |
(1,155) |
(1,200) |
|
Taxble cash flow |
5,478 |
8,531 |
13,072 |
5,120 |
|
Taxation at 28% |
(1,534) |
(2,389) |
(3,660) |
(1,434) |
|
Tax benefits (W2) |
1,400 |
1,050 |
788 |
2,362 |
|
After-tax CF |
5,478 |
8,397 |
11,733 |
2,248 |
928 |
DF at nominal rate |
0.909 |
0.826 |
0.751 |
0.683 |
0.621 |
PV |
4,980 |
6,936 |
8,812 |
1,535 |
576 |
Total PV or future CF |
22,839 |
Initial investment |
(20,000) |
ENPV |
2,839 |
Mức độ: Ít quan trọng
2.6. Dạng 6: Basic techniques
Câu 13: Basic
The following information relates to an investment project which is being evaluated by the directors of Fence Co, a listed company. The initial investment, payable at the start of the
the first year of operation is $3.9 million.
Year |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Net operating CF ($’000) |
1,200 |
1,500 |
1,600 |
1,580 |
Scrap value |
100 |
The directors believe that this investment project will increase shareholder wealth if it achieves a return on capital employed greater than 15%. As a matter of policy, the directors require all investment projects to be evaluated using both the payback and return on capital employed methods. Shareholders have recently criticized the directors for using these investment appraisal methods, claiming that Fence Co ought to be using the academically-preferred net present value method.
(a) What is the payback period of the investment project? years
(b) Based on the average investment method, what is the percentage return on capital
employed (ROCE) of the investment project, to one decimal place? %
(c) Which TWO of the following statements about investment appraisal methods are
correct?
A. |
The return on capital employed method considers the time value of money |
B. |
Return on capital employed must be greater than the cost of equity if a project is to be accepted |
C. |
Riskier projects should be evaluated with shorter payback periods |
D. |
Payback period ignores the timing of cash flows within the payback period |
Answer:
(a) A
Payback period = 2 + (1,200/1,600) = 2.75 years.
(b) 26%
Average annual accounting profit = (Total operating cash flows – total depreciation)/life of project = (5,880 – 3,800)/4 = $520,000 per year
Average investment = (3,900 + 100)/2 = $2,000,000
ROCE = 100 × 520/2,000 = 26%.
(c) C & D
Risk can be taken into account by shortening the required payback period, meaning
that only those cash flow closer to the present (and thus less risky) are considered.
Payback period ignores the timing of cash flows within the payback period is correct.
Câu 14: Which TWO of the following statements are true of the IRR and the NPV methods of
appraisal?
- IRR ignores the relative sizes of investments
- IRR is easy to use where there are non-conventional cash flows (eg cash flow
changes from negative to positive and then back to negative over time) - NPV is widely used in practice
- IRR is technically superior to NPV
Answer:
The IRR ignores the relative sizes of investments. It, therefore, does not measure the absolute increase in company value, and therefore shareholder wealth, which can be created by an investment. => 1 is true
Where cash flows change from negative to positive more than once there may be as many IRRs as there are changes in the direction of cash flows. So IRR is not easy to use in this situation => 4 is false then 3 is true.